abet raz
NEW DELHI (AP) — India’s former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, widely regarded as the architect of India’s economic reform program and a landmark nuclear deal with the United States, has died. He was 92. Singh was admitted to New Delhi’s All India Institute of Medical Sciences late Thursday after his health deteriorated due to a “sudden loss of consciousness at home,” the hospital said in a statement. “Resuscitative measures were started immediately at home. He was brought to the Medical Emergency” at 8:06 p.m., the hospital said, but “despite all efforts, he could not be revived and was declared dead at 9:51 p.m.” Singh was being treated for “age-related medical conditions,” the statement said. A mild-mannered technocrat, Singh became one of India’s longest-serving prime ministers for 10 years and leader of the Congress Party in the Parliament's Upper House, earning a reputation as a man of great personal integrity. He was chosen to fill the role in 2004 by Sonia Gandhi, the widow of assassinated Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi . But his sterling image was tainted by allegations of corruption against his ministers. Singh was reelected in 2009, but his second term as prime minister was clouded by financial scandals and corruption charges over the organization of the 2010 Commonwealth Games. This led to the Congress Party’s crushing defeat in the 2014 national election by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party under the leadership of Narendra Modi . Singh adopted a low profile after relinquishing the post of prime minister. Prime Minister Modi, who succeeded Singh in 2014, called him one of India’s “most distinguished leaders” who rose from humble origins and left “a strong imprint on our economic policy over the years.” “As our Prime Minister, he made extensive efforts to improve people’s lives,” Modi said in a post on the social platform X. He called Singh’s interventions in Parliament as a lawmaker “insightful” and said “his wisdom and humility were always visible.” Rahul Gandhi, from the same party as Singh and the opposition leader in the lower house of the Indian Parliament, said Singh’s “deep understanding of economics inspired the nation” and that he “led India with immense wisdom and integrity.” “I have lost a mentor and guide. Millions of us who admired him will remember him with the utmost pride,” Gandhi wrote on X. The United States offered its condolences, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken saying that Singh was “one of the greatest champions of the U.S.-India strategic partnership.” “We mourn Dr. Singh’s passing and will always remember his dedication to bringing the United States and India closer together,” Blinken said. Born on Sept. 26, 1932, in a village in the Punjab province of undivided India, Singh’s brilliant academic career took him to Cambridge University in Britain, where he earned a degree in economics in 1957. He then got his doctorate in economics from Nuffield College at Oxford University in 1962. Singh taught at Panjab University and the prestigious Delhi School of Economics before joining the Indian government in 1971 as economic advisor in the Commerce Ministry. In 1982, he became chief economic adviser to the Finance Ministry. He also served as deputy chair of the Planning Commission and governor of the Reserve Bank of India. As finance minister, Singh in 1991 instituted reforms that opened up the economy and moved India away from a socialist-patterned economy and toward a capitalist model in the face of a huge balance of payments deficit, skirting a potential economic crisis. His accolades include the 1987 Padma Vibhushan Award, India’s second-highest civilian honor; the Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Award of the Indian Science Congress in 1995; and the Asia Money Award for Finance Minister of the Year in 1993 and 1994. Singh was a member of India’s Upper House of Parliament and was leader of the opposition from 1998 to 2004 before he was named prime minister. He was the first Sikh to hold the country’s top post and made a public apology in Parliament for the 1984 Sikh Massacre in which some 3,000 Sikhs were killed after then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by Sikh bodyguards. Under Singh, India adopted a Right to Information Act in 2005 to promote accountability and transparency from government officials and bureaucrats. He was also instrumental in implementing a welfare scheme that guaranteed at least 100 paid workdays for Indian rural citizens. The coalition government he headed for a decade brought together politicians and parties with differing ideologies that were rivals in the country’s various states. In a move hailed as one of his biggest achievements apart from economic reforms, Singh ended India’s nuclear isolation by signing a deal with the U.S. that gave India access to American nuclear technology. But the deal hit his government adversely, with Communist allies withdrawing support and criticism of the agreement growing within India in 2008 when it was finalized. Singh adopted a pragmatic foreign policy approach, pursuing a peace process with nuclear rival and neighbor Pakistan. But his efforts suffered a major setback after Pakistani militants carried out a massive gun and bomb attack in Mumbai in November 2008. He also tried to end the border dispute with China, brokering a deal to reopen the Nathu La pass into Tibet, which had been closed for more than 40 years. His 1965 book, “India’s Export Trends and Prospects for Self-Sustained Growth,” dealt with India’s inward-oriented trade policy. Singh is survived by his wife Gursharan Kaur and three daughters. Associated Press writer Sheikh Saaliq in New Delhi contributed to this report.
Liverpool manager Arne Slot celebrates victory over Leicester (Peter Byrne/PA) Liverpool head coach Arne Slot continued to play down the significance of their place at the top of the Premier League despite it being strengthened by their 3-1 win over Leicester. Chelsea’s surprise defeat by Fulham meant victory over the Foxes stretched their lead to seven points, with a match in hand, with the halfway point of the campaign fast approaching. But Slot is maintaining his level-headed approach despite the clamour growing around their chances of adding another title to the one won in 2020. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. “If you are in this game for a long time like the players and I am then 20 games before the end you don’t look at it as there are so many challenges ahead of you,” he said after Cody Gakpo, Curtis Jones and Mohamed Salah scored to turn around an early deficit following Jordan Ayew’s strike. “Injuries and and a bit of bad luck can happen to any team, it is far too early to be already celebrating – but it is nice for us to be where we are. “I don’t think there was any easy win for us in any of these games; it could have been an easy win against Tottenham but we conceded two and it was then 5-2 – that tells you how difficult it is to win even when you have all your players available. “That is why we have to take it one game at a time. The league table is something of course we are aware of but we always understand how many games there are to go.” Ruud van Nistelrooy’s team led early on against Liverpool (Peter Byrne/PA) Leicester boss Ruud van Nistelrooy felt his side held their own until Salah scored in the 82nd minute. “I think we were in the contest for a result for a long time,” he said. “Three-one was the turning point in the sense the game was done there to get a result. “I think the 60th minute I remember a chanced for Daka to score the equaliser so we were in the game to get a surprising result. “We did well, we did what we could: a good start with the goal but if you speak of a turning point, 3-1 with Salah, the game was done.” Van Nistelrooy left goalkeeper Danny Ward out of the squad after he struggled in the defeat to Wolves and was jeered by his own fans. Danny Ward was left out by Leicester (Mike Egerton/PA) “The change in goal was one to make and the conversation with Wardy was impressive, the way he was thinking of the team and the club,” added the Dutchman. “I insisted on a conversation and of course it is a private conversation but what I want to share is the person and the professional he is. “I was impressed with that and his willingness for the team and the club to do well. “Really tough what happened for him. We are professionals but human beings as well, when frustration is being directed towards one person that is difficult.”Richard Parsons, prominent Black executive who led Time Warner and Citigroup, dies at 76
Six things we learned from the election campaign trail today
Maharashtra: Dhananjay Munde Meets CM Devendra Fadnavis At Sahyadri Guest House, Demands Death Penalty For Beed Sarpanch's Killers
CDC chief urges focus on health threats as agency confronts political changesTMC Class Action Notice: Robbins LLP Reminds Investors of the Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Against TMC the metals company Inc.Shakespeare’s timeless masterpiece, Othello, cautions us that certain things are better left unaltered. The phrase “Let it alone” serves as a poignant reminder to preserve the integrity of what is already exemplary. The recent proposal by the Federal Executive Council to rechristen the University of Abuja as Yakubu Gowon University is a decision that should evoke profound concern among all patriotic Nigerians, particularly those who cherish national unity, identity, and educational heritage. The idea of renaming the University of Abuja to Yakubu Gowon University since the announcement has sparked intense debate and protests from students, indigenous people of Abuja and other stakeholders. This move is part of a larger political culture of changing the names of tertiary institutions to immortalize politicians, which is highly unnecessary, especially for schools that have lived for decades. Universities are brands that have been built over decades, and changing their names can confuse foreign employers and academic institutions. For instance, if a university’s name were to be changed, it would be a challenge for graduates and raise questions about the validity of certificates issued to graduates. Moreover, renaming a university can be a complex issue. It’s essential to consider the potential consequences and ensure that any changes align with the institution’s values and mission. This is particularly important for institutions like the University of Abuja, which has established a strong reputation over the years and is known for unity and scholarship. It’s puzzling why anyone would risk damaging the reputation of a university for political gain. There are alternative ways to honour notable individuals, such as naming national symbols, or infrastructure after them. This approach would allow us to recognise the contributions of notable individuals without compromising the identity and heritage of our universities. This rejection is not driven by political resentment and as a matter of fact, this writer is a staunch member of APC but by a desire to maintain the integrity and recognition of Nigerian universities worldwide. In Social Exchange Theory, we are taught that honouring individuals for their achievements in office is not a bad omen. However, considering Gowon’s role in establishing five universities in his time as Head of State between 1966-1975, including the University of Jos, wouldn’t it be more fitting to rename the University of Jos after him instead? This approach would not only honour Gowon’s legacy but also acknowledge his contributions to the establishment of the University of Jos. Renaming the University of Abuja, on the other hand, might be seen as erasing its unique identity and the values it represents. Isn’t it worth considering alternative ways to honour Gowon’s legacy, such as naming a new institution, a major landmark after him or the unity schools? This argument isn’t about diminishing General Yakubu Gowon’s remarkable legacy. As a revered elder statesman and gentleman, he played a pivotal role in preserving Nigeria’s unity during the Civil War, and his contributions undoubtedly deserve recognition and immortalisation. Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the best President we never had was deservedly honoured with the rechristening of the former University of Ife after him in 1987. This was in acknowledgement of his visionary endeavour in conceptualising and developing that iconic institution, which once held the record of arguably the most beautiful university campus in Africa. The erstwhile University of Ife was one of Awolowo’s several heroics in the consummation of the growth of the old Western region. However, honouring Gowon’s legacy shouldn’t come at the expense of dismantling an institution that embodies the very unity he fought tirelessly to preserve. Related News Deputy Senate president restates N'Assembly's commitment to oversight functions Group hails Badaru over collaboration with security agencies AFAN advocates increased support for Bayelsa farmers The National Assembly, stakeholders of higher education and every Nigerian who believes in the power of unity and heritage, I implore you to reject this proposal as students and stakeholders of the University of Lagos resisted and rebelled against the attempt by the government of former President Goodluck Jonathan to re-designate the school after Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola in 2012. They voted loud and clear for the retention of the preexisting name and brand. The University of Abuja is not just another institution; it is a living embodiment of our national aspiration. Its name carries the weight of hope, and possibility, a Nigeria that can transcend its differences. The name ‘University of Abuja’ is more than a geographical descriptor. It is a brand, an identity, a promise. It stands shoulder to shoulder with legendary institutions like the University of Nigeria and the University of Lagos — each name a testament to something greater than a single individual. As always said by the immediate past Vice Chancellor of the University, Prof Abdul-Rasheed Na’Allah, UniAbuja is a number one University in Nigeria by accident of location. This institution is more than just a place of learning; it is a symbol of national unity, federal character, and collective identity. To rename it is to undermine these principles and send the wrong message to future generations. Let us preserve the University of Abuja for what it represents: a beacon of hope, unity, and national identity. Let us honour our past leaders in ways that do not compromise the core values and identities that bind us together as a nation. The University of Abuja must remain the University of Abuja. By preserving this name, we safeguard the sanctity of our national unity and ensure that future generations inherit an institution where the diverse spirit of Nigeria is celebrated and truly represented. The proposed name change is not just an administrative decision; it is a potential erosion of a carefully constructed symbol of national unity. The University of Abuja represents what Nigeria can be: diverse, integrated, and respectful of all its constituent parts. Let us protect this and let the University of Abuja remain the University of Abuja — a beacon of hope, a sanctuary of national integration, and a testament to what we can achieve when we see beyond our differences. Our unity is sacred. Our institutions are its guardians. The University of Abuja must remain exactly what it is: A University for all Nigerians. Universities displace indigenous people when you rename universities at a whim. You erase the history of people who identify with that place and what it stands for. I would suggest a national call for a stop to this tradition, not just UniAbuja. Instead, the government can build new infrastructure in those universities and name them after politicians like “Yakubu Gowon Digital Development Mega Library” or Hostels. To President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, you’re a father of the nation and a respected democrat. All the students of the University of Abuja are standing for your mandate, not for the gain of political goodies but in firm belief of your capacity. We hope you will have a rethink on this issue at hand. You have done so well for the nation’s educational sector, with the largest percentage given to education in the 2025 budget, which no one has done before you. In this light, we implore you not to give UniAbuja a new name, let it alone. •Sulayman Nafiu, a student of Law at the University of Abuja, writes via [email protected]
I'M A CELEB viewers were left horrified when they tuned in tonight to see Rev Richard and Tulisa forced to eat the body parts of mice and spiders. Both stars were selected for the dreaded food challenge, which sees contestants forced to eat unusual cuisine without throwing up. 4 Rev Richard and Tulisa were the unlucky pair picked for the food challenge tonight Credit: ITV 4 Viewers complained that I'm A Celeb bosses went too far with the options this year 4 Tulisa could be seen sweating and crying as she choked down foul cuisine Viewers expect the Bushtucker Trials to be disgusting, but this year fans of the show found themselves unable to watch as Rev Richard choked back mice feet. Then things got even worse as Tulisa had to chow down on a selection of spiders. Fans flocked to social media to complain that production was "taking the p*ss", as they agreed that the game had gone too far. One disgusted audience member at home hit out: "Physically couldn’t watch Richard eat the mice tails/legs I started gagging. read more in I'm A Celeb 'untenable' situation I'm A Celeb's Dean 'forced off BBC radio show amid bullying row' lovebirds I’m a Celeb’s GK Barry sends sweet message to girlfriend Ella Rutherford "AND TULISA AND THE SPIDERS EW?!" Another chimed in: "F**king mice tails, production are taking the piss this year." A shocked viewer added: "This is by far the most disgusting eating trial ever Jesus Christ the tails nahhhh." A second agreed: "This has to be one of the worst eating trials in years." Most read in I’m A Celebrity 2024 lovebirds I’m a Celeb’s GK Barry sends sweet message to girlfriend Ella Rutherford SOMETHING FISHY Reverend Richard gagging as he struggles to swallow fish eye on I'm A Celeb THAT'S AMOORE Jane Moore returns to I'm A Celeb hotel and reunites with Ruth Langsford AND SPAT'S THAT Jane Moore breaks silence on 'Washing-up-gate' and spat with Barry McGuigan Someone else screamed: "THE SPIDERS NO WHAT THE F**K THATS SICK THESE EATING TRIALS ARE ON ANOTHER LEVEL TF." Despite facing such a daunting task, Tulisa and Rev Richard both powered through and managed to win 11 stars for their team mates back at camp. 4 Tulisa had to block Ant and Dec's commentary out as she ate two spidersNone
Conor McGregor makes new public statement and UFC comeback vow after losing civil case
- Previous: a jaballa
- Next: